Psychological Route to War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Psychological Route to war - Essay ExampleThe act of war is a decisiveness with the ultimate consequence. With such magnitude that comes with the resolution of war, it becomes urgent to understand the political and historical context that comes with such a decision. The constitution makes the President commanding officer in chief of the armed forces plainly requires that Congress appropriate every last(predicate) money for the military. The president appoints ambassadors, but the Senate must confirm them. The president can sign treaties, but they have no meaning unless the Senate, by a two-thirds vote, ratifies them. Congress must declare war, but the United States has often gone to war without any perfunctory declaration. The reason is simple America backs its fighting forces, and when they are put in harms way, Congress pays their bills, (Wilson p.348).With such insurmountable risks at hand, the psychological cogitate behind resorting to a declaration of war to resolve con flict is an imperative idea to assess and analyze. To have one person be given the Godly role of placing citizenry in a perilous situation, the psychology of what leads them there is tantalizing to contemplate. Humans by nature palpate themselves at one point in their lives being in the position of having to make a decision that has ramifications of monumental proportion. Psychology Today writes that, War is probably the second almost popular activity with the pitying race, says psychologist Lawrence LeShan, Ph.D., author of the recently published book, The Psychology of War (Helios Press, 2002). Making love, he concedes, is the first. In his book, LeShan argues that wars popularity stems from its unique top executive to resolve two major psychological deprivations. It fulfills our sense of independence by assigning it a purpose, and it fulfills our need for community by establishing boundaries between us and them, Adding that, We say we love peace, but it doesnt actually exci te us, says LeShan. Even pacifists utter more about the horrors of war than the glories of peace. Battle generates perceptions so attractive that they can shift people from a rational perspective to one of war mode, the idealized perception of crusading against evil. But as LeShan notes, After its all over, you might have solved one problem, but you wont have solved all of them, (Allen p.1).Humans, as a sign of their nature, can find themselves letting their subconscious desires filter into the decision making capabilities of their logical mental capacity on the outside. It is those unspoken desires which can lead the person into the most dangerous situations, with the direst of conclusions, or lead them into the most amazing of successes. In the end, as it comes down to it, the chips ultimately fall wherever they may and it is up to whomever is at the helm to make the important decisions with only their natural resolve, as well as the conviction of their psyches, to surpass them as best as they see fit at the present time. To assess the psychological reasoning behind the act of declaring war, one must